|
Post by calirose02 on Jan 29, 2008 22:23:40 GMT
I have jst created a new sig, but i want it go side by side with my R & M one, then my army banner at the bottom is this possible? cause love both of them and want them both as my sig This is the new sig
|
|
|
Post by Mischa is my life! on Jan 29, 2008 22:53:12 GMT
Something like it is now??
(Being a mod I have access at users' profiles...so I edited it...hope u dont mind?) *blush*
|
|
|
Post by Jo Pearson on Jan 30, 2008 0:26:48 GMT
Nicola, While those are nice images, having both of them in your sig does actually break the forum's rule 7, which covers sigs: Rule 7: Signatures: In order to stop the forum becoming clogged with excessively large signatures, the following limits apply: - A maximum of 10 (ten) lines of text.
- One large image, up to 500 pixels wide by 250 pixels high, with a maximum file size of 40kb, which replaces two of the ten lines of text. (Note: at present, the limit is 600 x 250 pixels...)
- Up to four small “banner” images up to 25 pixels high by 500 pixels wide, each replacing two lines of text. However, if two small banner images are displayed side-by-side on the same line, then the pair of images just counts as two lines of text, not as four.
So, using these guidelines, you can have one large image, your “Mischa Barton Army” banner if you have one, and up to six lines of text. Or, you can have your large image and MBA banner, plus four small banner images in pairs on two lines, and two lines of text. If you have any questions about your signature, please seek advice and guidance from the global moderators or myself.
At present, those images are displaying "stacked" one above the other on my screen, not side-by-side. If you want to use both images, you ideally need to combine them both into a single image no more than 600 x 250 pixels. Now, I'm always prepared to cut people here some slack and allow a little leeway (which is why I don't say anything about the posting of images up to 700 pixels wide when the limit is technically 600 pixels...). So, if you can get the combined size of the images down to no more than 700 pixels wide by 250 pixels high, it's kind of OK for you to use them both, but I'd rather prefer you use one or the other... Sorry to be a bit of a downer on this, hun, but one thing I don't want is for this forum to become so clogged with big sigs that it slows down and becomes frustrating to use.
|
|
|
Post by calirose02 on Jan 30, 2008 21:23:58 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Jo Pearson on Jan 30, 2008 21:34:59 GMT
Please don't feel too bad about this, hun... There aren't all that many rules here, and we're not that strict about enforcing some of them. But the ones concerning images are fairly important because the use of over-large images can cause all sorts of problems with viewing the forum.
If anyone ever has any doubts about if something is allowed, just PM either myself or one of the global mods (probably Irvin or Chia can give you the quickest answer...), and we can usually clarify the situation for you.
|
|